You are reading a single comment by @ffm and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • How much more needs to be done before we stop think that it's just business as usual from a cycling perspective?

    Why should one of the most low-risk activities there is, along with walking and running and similar stuff, not be 'business as usual' for as long as possible? Is the goal here to create the maximum disruption possible?

    Why can't we do our bit to minimise risk around cycling before everything else is sorted first?

    We do. No one here advocated going on a big group ride and hanging out together at a cafe. In that sense, it's already not 'business as usual' at all.

    "Well it's all people I've seen recently isn't it? And we're not going to be hugging one another, and the kids have all probably had it already anyway, and we'll all have separate drinks, so it's not like anyone's going to be catching it at a barbecue is it? And we all need to get together now and then to keep our spirits up"

    Sorry, but no. That's just bullshit. There is a very big difference between going for a ride on your own, not touching anything but your bike, with a pretty considerable distance to any other human, and going to a fucking social gathering where you stand around in close proximity, possibly in a semi-enclosed area, and pass each other things.

    This is exactly what I meant earlier: Banning social gatherings is of course under normal circumstances a pretty big violation of people's normal rights, but it makes sense in this context as it is in fact a prime way of spreading the infection very quickly, and therefore a priority in terms of things that need to be addressed. That however does NOT mean we now need to ban everything you could possibly do immediately.

  • There is a very big difference between going for a ride on your own, not touching anything but your bike, with a pretty considerable distance to any other human, and going to a fucking social gathering where you stand around in close proximity, possibly in a semi-enclosed area, and pass each other things.

    I agree! But you're missing the point that some people are doing those things because their common sense tells them that it's fine to bend the rules. We need to be really careful that we're not doing the same (and being perceived as doing the same) because there is no a priori reason that anyone should trust our judgement and not theirs.

  • because there is no a priori reason that anyone should trust our judgement and not theirs.

    But it's not really about 'our' vs 'their' judgement - one thing is something that is a group activity, the other one isn't (or at least doesn't have to be the way most people on here do it now). Refer to literally any person who knows something about disease spread to figure out which one is probably a lot more OK than the other.

    Sure there's idiots who will justify doing a group activity to themselves somehow, but, well, they're just wrong about that and it's not exactly difficult to explain why it is a bad idea.

About

Avatar for ffm @ffm started