You are reading a single comment by @skinny and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
skinny-
I'm sure it's not what you meant, as 'pedestrianisation' is often used in a loose way meaning something like 'civilising' a street, but if Oxford Street became pedestrianised, you wouldn't be able to ride a bike along there any more--not necessarily because it might be prohibited, but simply because there wouldn't be any space for riding.
Oxford Street clearly needs changes, but I don't think pedestrianisation is the answer.
(I do think it's worth making that distinction, by the way, and not nit-picking, so apologies in advance if you think it is.)
Oliver Schick
That is encouraging and kind of what I've been repeating to myself like a mantra all week, if they're looking stocked again I'll be reassured.
And virus apart it seems ironic to say cycling accidents may put an extra burden on the NHS in case of an accident, when its so deserted at the moment its probably the safest city cycling ever at the moment. Here's Oxford St today, Saturday just before 1pm, pretty amazing really, even quieter than the Christmas day rides, so much more pleasant and safer than normal.
Piccaddilly Circus
Also in view of the fatality and injury statistics I would have said they should be banning driving before cycling if they want to reduce an extra NHS burden, but funny not heard any mention of that yet.