You are reading a single comment by @deleted and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
I thought it was pretty well accepted that last week's behavioural science / herd immunity strategy was in tatters, and that the predictive modeling that drove it was based on false assumptions.
Some source information here:
Change in strategy resulted in SAGE accepting the Imperial MRC research as I understand it.
deleted-
With the timing I saw that as media management and continued nudging.
[edit] Input data altered. Specifically the numbers of patients visiting hospital needing itc beds if I remember correctly. [/edit]
-
Talking as they did of herd immunity was a PR debacle but the theory remains, if you value stability ~ next spring.
It involves more people dying overall ... so of course government will avoid dwelling on it.
miro_o
It’s not public knowledge whether the strategy is in effect or not.
Just because I’m shocked at how people have acted, doesn’t mean the experts and advisors are.