You are reading a single comment by @deleted and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
My intention wasn't 'I think you are wrong so show me your evidence'.
My intention was, there appears to be some consensus that children are less at risk then the elderly in the case of Sars-Cov-2, which was again reflected in the advice from the CMO yesterday. I might be misremembering, but I think CMO went as far as saying that was due to the different immune response of kids. As a parent of young kids I took some comfort from that.
I think what I was trying to understand was if Lowbrows was looking at specific data / sources that called that into question or overturned that view in the case of this pandemic. Or whether it was just a general caution about children.
deleted
Chalfie
Edit: I'm responding in this way because there have been a number of interactions in the last day that seem to suggest people on here are not listening / reading. Like "the cmonsays let all young people get it and then care for elderly"
And
Vitamin d will save the day!!