-
There is a balance between pure epidemiological response and behavioral psychology. Going hard too early risks people not believing the seriousness and/or getting bored of the restrictions and not following them when it is most necessary.
It's not 'carrying on as normal', it's waiting for the time when each action will be most effective, in the knowledge that actions are all only going to be able to slow things so much.I'm no fan of the government (and I'm certain they will use this to cover multiple failures elsewhere) but it seems a reasonable, expert-led process thus far.
For the NHS to cope, we needed to flatten the curve. We could have been far more proactive in at least four areas:
The alternative is waiting for the wave to hit then implementing the measures above, which is where I think we will end up. You end up with the same (or greater) economic impact, but with a far higher public health impact.
The following was understood in late January / early February:
A containment strategy limited to testing people with symptoms from affected regions followed by contact tracing was self evidently doomed to failure.
Carrying on as normal and hoping it wouldn't happen here, in the face of the evidence, was crushingly stupid.