You are reading a single comment by @jj72 and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Yes I know that I am going for an evocative conversation title. Feels like it needs one.

    So from here: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-51707616

    To me it feels like that a decent (expensive) barrister was used to prove that someone who broke the law, and knew he was doing so, got away with it.

  • Luckily the case was heard at the Old Bailey, where they tend to listen to evidence and have skilled barristers with experience of these things, and then a jury makes a decision based on what they’ve heard.

    Based on that, I’d say your heading is a tad misleading.

  • I’d say your heading is a tad misleading

    I disagree, there is a big difference between justice and the Law.

    I repeat my end line-To me it feels like that a decent (expensive) barrister was used to prove that someone who broke the law, and knew he was doing so, got away with it.

About

Avatar for jj72 @jj72 started