You are reading a single comment by @Alan_tbt and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Sure someone with better knowledge of the law will chip at some point, but I think the tl;dr of this one is that even though he was breaking the speed limit and was uninsured / unlicensed neither of these things contributed to the collision, or rather, had he been travelling at the speed limit or a reasonable speed below it, and had he been either licensed and insured or hadn't fiddled with the bike, the outcome would have been not significantly different. The CCTV illustrates this.

    Not that this is any consolation for anyone involved.

  • Even though these things did not contribute to the accident could/should he be charged with the offences, just not in relation to the accident itself?

  • Yeah presumably he would be but it’s not newsworthy. Or if it is I’ve missed it.

    Presumably a fine and points on his license if he has one.

  • Earlier reporting said he wasn't contesting those offences, so I guess he was charged?

About

Avatar for Alan_tbt @Alan_tbt started