The case of a cyclist hitting a pedestrian who was looking at her phone has surely been discussed here but I was wondering what kind of insurance would have protected him?The article repeatedly mentions his lack of insurance as the reason for being legally vulnerable to The other party’s claim?
The case of a cyclist hitting a pedestrian who was looking at her phone has surely been discussed here but I was wondering what kind of insurance would have protected him?The article repeatedly mentions his lack of insurance as the reason for being legally vulnerable to The other party’s claim?
https://www.theguardian.com/law/2020/feb/24/cyclist-settles-for-30000-pounds-after-hitting-pedestrian-who-was-looking-at-phone