You are reading a single comment by @frankenbike and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Ah yeah, I'm dumb. It's exponential with a non-zero baseline is what I meant. Or accelerating. Or something.
Edit: specifically since 1970 which I arbitrarily selected for maximum outrage
Edit: what I really mean is second derivative of population is positive and second deriv. of total housing stock is negative.
If you're going to use graphs and maths and shit, please don't use exponentially in a hyperbolic* fashion.
*Lols
No way does your top curve show exponential growth. It doesn't even look linear, let alone polynomial, heaven forbid exponential.