• The other is purely logistical - pressure on services, need for housing etc.

    Net immigration accounts for like 0.2% population growth year on year, it's basically a rounding error. It's clearly not the cause of those issues.

    The issue with housing is we haven't been building any houses. Population is bigger than ever but in the last decade housebuilding reached its lowest level for 100 years or something (ignoring WWII). That's insane.

    The issue with services is lack of funding. Increasing the number of users from 1000 to 1002 isn't going to be the straw that breaks the GP's back.

    Edit: recognise that I'm shooting the messenger slightly

  • I do agree - as I said in my first post, I don't agree with the anto immigration argument.

    Difficulty is persuading people who "feel" the impact of immigration (which I completely agree is to a great extent a story of underfunding of services) that they're wrong.

About