-
So, person implementing anti-immigration laws being child of immigrants who would not be allowed into the country under the scheme she's implementing is not a point for discussion?
That doesn't strike you as hypocritical at all?
If I was in her position - god forbid - and asked to discuss or comment on this I would state that then is not now.
Howard-
Considering her track record on differentiating between opposites, I think considering multiple tenses is a step too far.
-
If I was in her position - god forbid - and asked to discuss or comment on this I would state that then is not now.
Another rebuttal, one that makes more sense to me, is that a single case does not disprove the general position.
Yes her parents did well, but at the expense of letting in thousands of other work shy, job stealing (hmmmm?), benefit scrounging (hmmmmm?), gobbldey-gook babbling proto-terrorists.
We all believe in the fallacy of anecdotal data, don't we? So who cares about her parents?
mmccarthy
mashton
So, person implementing anti-immigration laws being child of immigrants who would not be allowed into the country under the scheme she's implementing is not a point for discussion?
That doesn't strike you as hypocritical at all?
Not sure where the brown bit comes into play, unless you get extra points in this scheme for not being brown.