You are reading a single comment by @Howard and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • That seems to be a rather over blown peice. The fundamental concept has some merit, but I think the outcome described is wildly exaggerated.

    If you'd owned an index tracker for the past 5 or more decades, you'd be doing ok and would have outperformed active portfolios in aggregate.

    Where's the proof that active investing has been key to the success of stock indexes since their conception? I don't see it.

    Edit: when I click on your link, I get a different article which starts:

    "BlackRock is already the world’s largest asset manager, but it is in touching distance of another crown: becoming Britain’s biggest."

    I've got a subscription to the FT.

    2nd Edit: apologies, I see you were quoting one of the comments. Obvs, comments are a free for all and largely there for shits and giggles.

    Agree that the article was pretty bland and not what I expect for my £50 a month.

  • I think the outcome described is wildly exaggerated.

    FWIW I think the same.

    That the guy from Hounslow managed to manipulate the trackers in an index is interesting though.

  • I don't think he was alone...considering he was given a plea bargain.
    A few big whales can shift market. It's the hedge funds that are the real big players.

About

Avatar for Howard @Howard started