You are reading a single comment by @hippy and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • The article suggests there doesn't need to be a reason under the code. Although retesting samples of an athlete whose coach has been banned seems like as good a reason as any.

    I don't quite follow Sapstead's position as surely there would be enough samples to re-test some and preserve some for future advancements in testing.

  • preserve some for future advancements in testing.

    That's what they were doing with Olympic samples. May be budget concerns with this for local authorities though?

About

Avatar for hippy @hippy started