The article suggests there doesn't need to be a reason under the code. Although retesting samples of an athlete whose coach has been banned seems like as good a reason as any.
I don't quite follow Sapstead's position as surely there would be enough samples to re-test some and preserve some for future advancements in testing.
The article suggests there doesn't need to be a reason under the code. Although retesting samples of an athlete whose coach has been banned seems like as good a reason as any.
I don't quite follow Sapstead's position as surely there would be enough samples to re-test some and preserve some for future advancements in testing.