Doping

Pun-tastic - He's erected a good defence.

1 Attachment

Things were said. Boners were possibly had. Dope possibly did. Wives insulted. Dead three year olds sworn on.

Doping aside Sutton is coming across as every bit the nasty cunt he's rumoured to be....

Can you bully people into getting world records? Yes, yes you can

A female said she saw him injecting during his racing period . I guess a lot of women have it in for him if that is how he is .

I'm rather expecting that lap top is going to turn up soon.......

"I just thought I'd give those cushions on the settee a bit of a tidy up, and what d'you know, there it was down the back of the sofa!"

Not too sure this is the place, but this is a pipe and stash box that fits in the steerer

Wilson Kipsang suspended with whereabouts failures and tampering charges: https://www.runnersworld.com/uk/news/a30500148/wilson-kipsang-anti-doping-violations/

His management, Volare sports, stressed that he has not failed a drugs test

German broadcaster Deutche Wells estimates that 60 Kenyan athletes have been sanctioned for violating anti-doping procedures in the last five years

Whereabouts is obvious, but I wonder what the tampering is...

Kenya, the new Russia, the new China...

Maybe passing someone else's sample as his own to avoid a positive?

...the spiritual and 'training' home of Mo Farah.

and on WADAs monitoring list.

Testing, what testing?

Move along, nothing to see here...

https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/jan/20/jessica-judd-ukad-mo-farah-samples

Far be it for me to defend UKAD, especially when it comes to Athletics, but the point they make is absolutely correct; any request to retest samples has to follow due process as laid out in the rules of the sport. To do otherwise completely undermines the anti-doping process.

The article suggests there doesn't need to be a reason under the code. Although retesting samples of an athlete whose coach has been banned seems like as good a reason as any.

I don't quite follow Sapstead's position as surely there would be enough samples to re-test some and preserve some for future advancements in testing.

To do otherwise completely undermines the anti-doping process.

Like every single time a cyclist has an A sample positive and their name is revealed before the B sample test. Literally every time.. French AD = French newspapers?

preserve some for future advancements in testing.

That's what they were doing with Olympic samples. May be budget concerns with this for local authorities though?

So you think they've already disposed of some due to costs and now they are worried they don't have enough?

No, I think that some national AD agencies will have lower budgets and elect not to keep historical samples. I don't know what they're mandated to keep by WADA though, I thought it was only Olympics samples that were being kept.

In this case it sounds like UKAD has samples but is ignoring their own rules and not handing them over to WADA.

Yeah fair enough if that's the case, might be selective quoting in the article which implies otherwise.

You'd hope from what they no know about Salazar that they'd be able to be quite targeted in any retesting, and have some feel for whether testing has improved enough now.

https://cyclingtips.com/2020/01/de-vuysts-b-sample-also-positive/

http://www.wada-ama.org/en/media/news/2020-01/wada-provisionally-suspends-approved-status-of-moscow-laboratory

Rudy Pevenage has written a book and, apparently, there was some doping going on at Telecom.

there was some doping going on at Telecom

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SjbPi00k_ME

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/boxing/51098571

The BBC appear to have managed to write an in depth article on Tyson Fury without mentioning that he served a two year ban for steroids.