-
It sounds from the reporting like some kind of social cleansing crusade. Fucked up.
-
He pays his staff as little as possible and employment tribunals are risky in the extreme if you're low-paid - if you lose the case then you're fucked.
Plus you've got the hassle of trying to bring the case and deal with all the process and paperwork and all that shit in the first place, when you're out of work and scrambling to find something else for minimum wage/zero hours, or already in some other shit min wage job (or jobs) that sucks up all your time and energy.
He benefits from treating his employees like shit, safe in the knowledge that their circumstances make any kind of retaliation difficult. Obviously he's not the only cunt doing this, he's just currently one of the most visible ones in the news.
You are reading a single comment by @christianSpaceman and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
c00ps
bothwell
@christianSpaceman
Isn't most of this crazy behaviour illegal from an employment point of view?
I'd have thought that being sacked for incorrect change, or for not kicking people out for looking at their phones or whatever would simply allow for a fairly simple litigation?
It is annoying that the guy will never actually be adversely (financially) affected by the fallout from the kind of anti-social behaviour described though; I imagine hes doesn't exactly have a settled state of mind for obsessions like this at least.