-
But he never put himself in a position where he could influence any of those things.
I don't think it's personally his fault - those are the critical concerns of the Labour party. In choosing someone that the voters they need would simply never vote for they allowed it to happen that they would never be able to influence those policies.
I honestly have no clue what you're on about.
My point was don't abandon the left in the hopes of an electoral win for the sake of an electoral win. And you're writing riddles.
-
Am I writing rubbish? - I don't mean to :)
My point was don't abandon the left for the hopes of an electoral win for the sake of an electoral win.
I guess mine then is don't abandon the hopes of an electoral win for the sake of not compromising on leftist policy.
-
After so many electoral disappointments over the last decades here (and is aus), im a strong advocate of win at all cost nihilism.
christianSpaceman
d_m
But he never put himself in a position where he could influence any of those things. I'll happily agree that influencing and leading policy is the party leaders role, but so to is working towards their execution.
I don't think it's personally his fault - those are the critical concerns of the Labour party. In choosing someone that the voters they need would simply never vote for they allowed it to happen that they would never be able to influence those policies.