You are reading a single comment by @Stonehedge and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
The eight is wrong though.
There's just no correct way to do it: A correct eight would be totally confusing being upside down next to nine... -
It's better, but I wish they'd abandon reflective symmetry when using roman numerals and come up with something that looks perfectly balanced instead: creative use of a sub-dial/date/logo/etc.
The design approach is always: make them skinnier, no skinnier still, a little more, that's it: Imperfect!
drøn
JonoMarshall
@Stonehedge
This is a nice roman numeral dial. No number flipping and normal 4.
Only 24 grand.