You are reading a single comment by @SwissChap and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
It's a bit of a weird geometry if you ask me.
Also, on a side note, my pet peeve is bike companies who don't provide stack and reach numbers in their geometry charts. The two most important numbers to me, they must certainly be able to calculate them easily off their plans, but nope, half the time they still don't provide them.
Cheers - From what I can gather, I think this is unfortunately more of a 'tall and short' bike rather than the 'low and long' type that I'd need, thanks though.
SwissChap
Big_Ted
Thought it didn't look like a 53, sizes up more like a 55cm.