You are reading a single comment by @h2o and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • I think the re-nationalisation of energy is not revolutionary. I think the plan to align renationalised sectors to a green industrial ‘revolution’ is the exciting bit and the bit that’s being campaigned. The message is more ‘why’ and less ‘what’.

    i.e. taking over Stagecoach bus services isn’t a big deal. Providing free bus services is.

    ^ this is actually a Green (rather than Labour) policy, but hopefully you get the idea.

  • The message is more ‘why’ and less ‘what’.

    Well, it’s more like ‘how’. They’re proposing using public ownership of the grid to force change along. That’s a much better idea than nationalising the generating assets. Like I said, I like the plan. I just don’t think it’s revolutionary.

  • Swing voters gonna swing when they think values+policies align with their own (the messaging of ‘why’). Detail in execution (‘how’) is a relatively minor factor relating to wether or not the person/party is credible. This dynamic tracks issue complexity.

    But whatever you say boss.

About

Avatar for h2o @h2o started