You are reading a single comment by @deleted and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
yep! thats the point of data, to back up 'an argument' rather than 'the argument'!
-
You’ve cherry picked to show that cherry picking is a thing. Ok.
May was a loser. She just lost slowly.
She had the considerable advantage of being able to call an election when it suited her and her judgment was shown to be way off. She lost some respect, she lost her majority and had to pay into a relationship with the DUP that’d bleed her of power. Because she had to espouse Austerity whilst buying power she lost a fair bit of credibility with the electorate.
Direction of travel? Loser.
Corbyn’s gone the other way.
n3il
miro_o
@deleted
Sort of overlooks the fact that Theresa May, percevied to be a great loser, garnered 13.6m votes in 2017, more than the 13.5m that the great winner Tony Blair achieved in his high watermark of 1997, and 20% more than the 11.3m that delivered a majority for Cameron in 2015.
I think the only point proven here is that people selectively choose their data to back their argument!