Analog film photography and cameras

Posted on
Page
of 967
  • They're all really nice

  • I have to use b&w more, I’m just so used to colour. Really like HP5, haven’t used it much before.

  • Looking forward to shooting b&w again actually; just dropped off 2 rolls of Kodak ColorPlus yesterday for developing and thought to myself ok, well that's that then with warm-ish colour negative film until May 2020, haha.

    Lomography 800 ? It's essentially 800ISO Colorplus as it's allegedly based off the same Kodacolor VR emulsions that Colorplus is.

  • Lovely, now I want a roll.

  • Thanks for the tip, yet for me it's not so much about needing higher ISO film because it's not bright enough٭, but rather I don't shoot warm-ish colour negative film much during autumn / winter / spring here in Berlin as the light usually doesn't do it any favours.

    ٭ and if that were the case I would definitely spend a few more Euros for Portra 400/800, personally

  • Fair enough. Not sure what I'm going to swop to - I shot mostly Tri-X and HP5 pushed to 1600 the past couple of winters.
    Tempted to shoot colour with flash, just purely to get my head around using flash properly

  • Zeiss Ikon Nettar, Tri-X


    3 Attachments

    • 000034340007.jpg
    • 000034340004.jpg
    • 000034340012.jpg
  • ^ haha

  • All excellent as always, but I like this one best. Lovely reds and greens and nice light/shade

  • Thanks for the kind words!

    Yea, must have walked by that window a hundred times already, yet that day it was eye-catching all of a sudden.

  • Would love to get some two cents from some peeps in the know re. the scans I've been getting.

    Some artifacts can be seen I think in the two images below, as well as the blue line on the bottom which I'm guessing is a scanning artifact of some description? These are unedited and uploaded to Imgur if that makes a difference.

    Whereas this one (same roll) seems okay except again for that blue line.

    The place I go to for dev and scan seems to deal mostly with younger people developing disposable cameras post festival and the odd film student so I wouldn't be surprised if the attention to detail of the dev and scan process wasn't great. They offer a one hour WeTransfer turnaround that I find hard to resist most of the time.

    I always pick up the negatives and I intend to get a scanner by the years end so I'm well up for ingesting them all again if it turns out the photo shop's done a bum job.

  • How much are you paying for the 1 hour dev and scan? If its cheap theres no hard in getting these scans done and then scanning the ones you like seperately

  • Are you talking about the horizontal lines on the photos ? If so I'd check the negs first to rule that out. May have been a problem during dev in the minilab - that would be my first guess rather than a scanning issue.

  • In work on a standard issue HP monitor the above images I posted look a bit better than on the MSI laptop I was viewing them on at home, which spurred me to make the post. The horizontal lines were more pronounced and the gradient (best way I can put it) of the tonal change in the blues looked pretty messed up, in a lossy, compressed way.

    @Turkish Pay €12 for 1 hour turnaround of a 36 exp roll of 135 here in Dublin which feels about right for the convenience of the service. With a scanner I could just pay for dev ofc which would be €3.50 per roll, if I picked it up the next day.

    @Ste_S Yeah the lines and what looked like compression artefacts in the tonal gradient of the blues, but on a different monitor don't look as egregious now. I was thinking that the 1 hour dev/ scan turnaround I was getting may have meant the scan was set for speed rather than quality? Good point though I will inspect the negs.

  • It's chemtrails.

  • Sounds like some people are trying to ditch their stockpiling of Acros before it goes out of date and Acros II is released

  • Trawlin' through the archives.. can't remember whether I posted that one (does somebody by chance know that courier? This was Berlin in 2015..)


    1 Attachment

    • 2015-07_courier.jpg
  • Couple of shots came out of my GW690 looking like this. Any ideas? Scanning issue? Don't think it would be slow shutter speed because I never use less than 1/60th without a tripod/balancing it against something. Used filmdev and small frontier scans.

    Aside from that issue lots of the scans came out looking very overexposed and flat, generally unhappy with nearly 6 rolls :( need to go through them properly when I'm not at work


    2 Attachments

    • R6-01196-0001.JPG
    • R5-01195-0004.JPG
  • Post a reply
    • Bold
    • Italics
    • Link
    • Image
    • List
    • Quote
    • code
    • Preview
About

Analog film photography and cameras

Posted by Avatar for GA2G @GA2G

Actions