-
• #20202
I have to use b&w more, I’m just so used to colour. Really like HP5, haven’t used it much before.
-
• #20203
Looking forward to shooting b&w again actually; just dropped off 2 rolls of Kodak ColorPlus yesterday for developing and thought to myself ok, well that's that then with warm-ish colour negative film until May 2020, haha.
Lomography 800 ? It's essentially 800ISO Colorplus as it's allegedly based off the same Kodacolor VR emulsions that Colorplus is.
-
• #20204
Lovely, now I want a roll.
-
• #20205
Thanks for the tip, yet for me it's not so much about needing higher ISO film because it's not bright enough٭, but rather I don't shoot warm-ish colour negative film much during autumn / winter / spring here in Berlin as the light usually doesn't do it any favours.
٭ and if that were the case I would definitely spend a few more Euros for Portra 400/800, personally
-
• #20206
Fair enough. Not sure what I'm going to swop to - I shot mostly Tri-X and HP5 pushed to 1600 the past couple of winters.
Tempted to shoot colour with flash, just purely to get my head around using flash properly -
• #20207
Zeiss Ikon Nettar, Tri-X
3 Attachments
-
• #20208
^ haha
-
• #20209
-
• #20210
-
• #20211
-
• #20212
-
• #20213
-
• #20214
-
• #20215
All excellent as always, but I like this one best. Lovely reds and greens and nice light/shade
-
• #20216
Thanks for the kind words!
Yea, must have walked by that window a hundred times already, yet that day it was eye-catching all of a sudden.
-
• #20217
Would love to get some two cents from some peeps in the know re. the scans I've been getting.
Some artifacts can be seen I think in the two images below, as well as the blue line on the bottom which I'm guessing is a scanning artifact of some description? These are unedited and uploaded to Imgur if that makes a difference.
Whereas this one (same roll) seems okay except again for that blue line.
The place I go to for dev and scan seems to deal mostly with younger people developing disposable cameras post festival and the odd film student so I wouldn't be surprised if the attention to detail of the dev and scan process wasn't great. They offer a one hour WeTransfer turnaround that I find hard to resist most of the time.
I always pick up the negatives and I intend to get a scanner by the years end so I'm well up for ingesting them all again if it turns out the photo shop's done a bum job.
-
• #20218
How much are you paying for the 1 hour dev and scan? If its cheap theres no hard in getting these scans done and then scanning the ones you like seperately
-
• #20219
Are you talking about the horizontal lines on the photos ? If so I'd check the negs first to rule that out. May have been a problem during dev in the minilab - that would be my first guess rather than a scanning issue.
-
• #20220
In work on a standard issue HP monitor the above images I posted look a bit better than on the MSI laptop I was viewing them on at home, which spurred me to make the post. The horizontal lines were more pronounced and the gradient (best way I can put it) of the tonal change in the blues looked pretty messed up, in a lossy, compressed way.
@Turkish Pay €12 for 1 hour turnaround of a 36 exp roll of 135 here in Dublin which feels about right for the convenience of the service. With a scanner I could just pay for dev ofc which would be €3.50 per roll, if I picked it up the next day.
@Ste_S Yeah the lines and what looked like compression artefacts in the tonal gradient of the blues, but on a different monitor don't look as egregious now. I was thinking that the 1 hour dev/ scan turnaround I was getting may have meant the scan was set for speed rather than quality? Good point though I will inspect the negs.
-
• #20221
It's chemtrails.
-
• #20222
Acros for a tenner (they have 120 as well)
-
• #20223
Sounds like some people are trying to ditch their stockpiling of Acros before it goes out of date and Acros II is released
-
• #20224
Trawlin' through the archives.. can't remember whether I posted that one (does somebody by chance know that courier? This was Berlin in 2015..)
1 Attachment
-
• #20225
Couple of shots came out of my GW690 looking like this. Any ideas? Scanning issue? Don't think it would be slow shutter speed because I never use less than 1/60th without a tripod/balancing it against something. Used filmdev and small frontier scans.
Aside from that issue lots of the scans came out looking very overexposed and flat, generally unhappy with nearly 6 rolls :( need to go through them properly when I'm not at work
2 Attachments
They're all really nice