To repeat what I have repeatedly explained, it was unconstitutional for the Queen to appoint Boris Johnson in the first place when it was plain as a pikestaff that he could not command a parliamentary majority.
Sort of - he did technically have have a majority, but could he "command a majority?" Clearly not, as Conservative rebels had prevented the party from winning any meaningful vote for ages, and that situation was only getting worse.
Yeah, but it's obviously bollocks to say that the dogs in the street know. I know a few things about dogs, and I know they don't know that Johnson shouldn't have been appointed PM.
This is bollocks though...
He had a majority (albeit of 1) when appointed.