• This is bollocks though...

    To repeat what I have repeatedly explained, it was unconstitutional for the Queen to appoint Boris Johnson in the first place when it was plain as a pikestaff that he could not command a parliamentary majority.

    He had a majority (albeit of 1) when appointed.

  • Sort of - he did technically have have a majority, but could he "command a majority?" Clearly not, as Conservative rebels had prevented the party from winning any meaningful vote for ages, and that situation was only getting worse.

  • Yeah, but it's obviously bollocks to say that the dogs in the street know. I know a few things about dogs, and I know they don't know that Johnson shouldn't have been appointed PM.

About

Avatar for Scrabble @Scrabble started