• This is bollocks though...

    To repeat what I have repeatedly explained, it was unconstitutional for the Queen to appoint Boris Johnson in the first place when it was plain as a pikestaff that he could not command a parliamentary majority.

    He had a majority (albeit of 1) when appointed.

  • He had a majority (albeit of 1) when appointed.

    Technically, yes, although of course only under May's 'confidence and supply' arrangement. It is true, if perhaps not 'plain as a pikestaff' to everyone, that it was clear not all Tories would support him, even if the scale of the rebellion was a surprise.

About