-
• #58002
They have certainly upped their twitter game
https://twitter.com/KFC_UKI/status/1169970678658998277
(apologies for sauce)
-
• #58003
That chicken definitely looks chlorinated.
-
• #58004
Perfectly pitched by KFC.
-
• #58005
The last two days have been surreal. If that copper had vomited it would have been game over.
-
• #58006
It’s not even fried chicken.
-
• #58007
It's not even a menacing Corbyn image. He looks really friendly and nice.
-
• #58008
They wrote “eggsactly”. That’s not even the correct chicken pun for this stunt.
-
• #58009
this is amazing:
-
• #58010
This is pure Trumpian shit. It'll probably work.
-
• #58011
Should it have been delivered in a ‘go knife free’ box?
-
• #58012
I hope KFC sue them senseless.
JFC of Croydon should.
-
• #58013
I thought KFC dealt with it pretty well
1 Attachment
-
• #58014
This knobhead
A man spent £30,000 of his savings on a failed legal battle "for justice" over a £100 speeding fine.
Richard Keedwell, 71, said a "seriously flawed" legal system meant fighting the fine had taken nearly three years and used up his sons' inheritance money.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-hereford-worcester-49641063
-
• #58015
Smacks very much of knowing he was in the wrong, but let the lie go too far.
-
• #58016
Do we think his son is still talking to him?
-
• #58017
I enjoyed 'intercity' in the comments suggesting that speeding fines are 'another tax on the motorist'
-
• #58018
Instead of being glad that fines for speeding in general are so low and you get them so rarely...
-
• #58019
Amongst the many odious things said this morning by convicted abuser Geoffrey Boycott, he claimed that in French law you're guilty until proved innocent and that's one reason he supports Brexit. The presumption of innocence has been part of the French constitution since 1789, but hey.
Obv, being somebody who beats women up is rather more evil than being a lying Kipper. He's all of those things.
-
• #58020
From the comments:
It even says on the form that he would probably get a 33% discount on the fine. Therefore that £100 could well have dropped to just £77 and the matter would be closed.
-
• #58021
It was for going 35 in a 30mph zone. It's not like they said he was doing 80 in 40 zone and running over little old ladies.
And he still failed. It's not that the system is against him, it's that he thinks the system doesn't apply to him for some reason.
-
• #58022
this! How out of the world do you have to be.
-
• #58023
It read like he genuinely believed he was innocent like TooTallTim said maybe he's convinced himself of the lie, but wouldn't you get to a point where you go "you know what, I'll just fucking pay the fine instead of spending my life savings"?
Plus the shit about his son's inheritance - trying to make people feel sorry for him and his decisions.
-
• #58024
They don't even maths, bro.
Ok that starts to look a bit like desperation. Also, how long beforehand did they have this prepared?