Bike Anti-Porn - When Things Go Wrong

If the seat angle and lever placement were fixed it would have flown under most people's anti-radar.

looks like a wheeler from return to OZ

Wat?

1 Attachment

Apparently it's 'lightweight'. At over 13kgs.

It's so lightweight it needs two people to keep it upright.

The two hands are actually great, now I wait for a picture with 3 hands.

They belong to the same, really big, guy.

Wat?

It's a technology demonstrator. People use bicycles as demo objects because you can create a fully functioning one quickly and cheaply, and it's not likely to kill anybody when you drive it. It's not "Dear Giant, here's how you should make bikes", it's "Dear Spaceship/Remotely Operated Submersible/Race Car maker, if I can make a bicycle, imagine what I can do for you"

It's more the build tbh. Saint chainset, cheap brown chain (slack), short uprise stem (MTB?), no brakes or pedal retention, saddle angle etc....

Also its ugly

It's more the build

I expect it was built with whatever they could scrape up from the parts bin. It only has to roll without breaking or crashing to prove their point. Yes, it's ugly as sin and badly put together and a bad design, but to be anti- it first has to be an attempt to make a nice bicycle, and I'm pretty sure that was never their intention.

fairly certain there is no "saddle retention" either

Is it cast in concrete?

This is one of those truly special additions to this thread - seemingly fine at first glance; truly awful on closer inspection.

Oh Christ that's rotten...

.

1 Attachment

the waspbeik

I wait for a picture with 3 hands.

Needs more hands..

such aero bars though

#spoileralert

Biggest offender is the front QR