• I think he has been a good speaker, impartial, made watching parliamentary debates interesting if not exciting at times. I would say he just about manages to jump before he was pushed.

    U dizzy?

    The fact that he is bias towards my views doesn't stop me from seeing it.

    He gets top marks for hanging in for this long given the stack of complaints against him by staff. Which let's be honest is only down to the backing of the remain majority of the house.

    In any normal company he'd have been dismissed, or promoted and moved to another department with no direct line management.

  • What in particular do you think he has been biased over?

    Surely not Brexit, Bercow pretty much guaranteed that the referendum would happen in the first place. I'm not sure there would have been a referendum at all if it wasn't for Bercow.

  • Thinking particularly about the shinanigans during May's later period. Things like the Grieve amendment.

    I guess the counter is that he's given a voice to decenting voices, which in normal times a decent majority would make irrelevant.

    On balance I think he's been a decent speaker in exceptional times, but I definitely wouldn't say he's impartial.

About

Avatar for Stonehedge @Stonehedge started