You are reading a single comment by @Stonehedge and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
Thinking particularly about the shinanigans during May's later period. Things like the Grieve amendment.
I guess the counter is that he's given a voice to decenting voices, which in normal times a decent majority would make irrelevant.
On balance I think he's been a decent speaker in exceptional times, but I definitely wouldn't say he's impartial.
U dizzy?
The fact that he is bias towards my views doesn't stop me from seeing it.
He gets top marks for hanging in for this long given the stack of complaints against him by staff. Which let's be honest is only down to the backing of the remain majority of the house.
In any normal company he'd have been dismissed, or promoted and moved to another department with no direct line management.