-
• #22852
Possibly interesting...
-
• #22853
Isn’t it blatantly fake?
-
• #22854
That's what I thought
-
• #22855
Doubt it'll be there by morning.
-
• #22856
This one interesting...
1 Attachment
-
• #22857
Can't see anything that unusual wrt deletions on Politiwoops
Everything deleted by a Tory from July onwards:
https://www.politwoops.co.uk/search?date_from=2019-07-01T02%3A00%3A00%2B02%3A00&group=11&party=205&politicians=no&q=%2AAmusingly most of the recent deletions of older tweets seem to be from Tories who were tweeting their support for somebody other than Boris Johnson for the leadership (haven't seen anything brexit-specific though)
-
• #22858
.
1 Attachment
-
• #22859
So the Labour Party voted for legislation they didn't agree with in an attempt to appease the right-wing press and get them to stop attacking it? Hhhmmm. How's that plan working out?
-
• #22860
Poorly but to suggest they could have stopped or delayed it is a distraction I think. We are where we are now because of the Conservative Party and latterly their enablers in the DUP.
-
• #22861
Isn’t it blatantly fake?
Yup, I thought the same. Interesting to follow, or more to the point see who else is following it though - some serious journo-types, as well as the usual nutcases (I include myself here).
-
• #22862
May offered them the exact same deal three times and refused any and all meaningful alterations to it because red lines. In that circumstance, what can parliament do apart from repeat the same answer?
-
• #22863
Some light relief in the form of Piers Morgan being verbally pissed on.
1 Attachment
-
• #22864
Made me lol that, cheers.
-
• #22865
https://medium.com/@MrMichaelShaw/three-charts-that-sum-up-the-uks-craziness-right-now-91e456f196c5
Depressingly though, the number of people on the No Deal = V Good-Acceptable Compromise is still way too high.
-
• #22866
Have got https://tacticalvote.co.uk ready just in case
Has the increase in popularity of the LibDems and Greens changed much?
-
• #22867
Parliament could have said what it wanted instead of May's deal. It had the opportunity to do so, without being bound by May's red lines. It failed to do so, because MPs couldn't agree on an alternative. Twice. Parliament has been very good at turning down May's deal, but spectacularly poor at agreeing on an alternative.
-
• #22868
-
• #22869
We haven't done the analysis yet... or rather, it's not me that does that bit and it's underway.
-
• #22870
Unbelievable little thread. Seems to think we're going to leave without a deal, but with deals to keep things working smoothly, but it'll still be no deal
-
• #22871
Let's hope. It'll still be messy, though. Another public vote of some sort is absolutely necessary at this point.
-
• #22872
🇬🇧&🇪🇺 understand & agree that our wealth creators need to be able to move freely between our territories.
Freedom of movement you say? Knobhead.
-
• #22873
A decent article
https://www.lowyinstitute.org/the-interpreter/brexit-deal-or-no-deal
-
• #22874
Parliament could have said what it wanted instead of May's deal. It had the opportunity to do so, without being bound by May's red lines.
They were whipped votes. Too many spineless careerists toed the line. (Or to be very, very charitable - thought that supporting the government would result in a deal eventually).
-
• #22875
Has this been resolved yet?
The Conservatives with the DUP had the votes to pass Article 50 whatever the Labour leadership whipped. Abstaining or voting against would have just guaranteed Labour would be excoriated by the press just as they were beginning to get their manifesto message across to a wider audience.