One is the leader of the opposition with (more of) a democratic and constitutional mandate to form a government.
This is where I fundamentally disagree. Being leader of the opposition is exactly why I think Corbyn is less qualified to run a caretaker government - he doesn't want it to be a caretaker one only.
Constitutionally, all that matters is that the PM of GoNU commands the support of the house. If Corbyn can do that, fine, but evidence is he can't - in which case he has no constitutional mandate at all.
This is where I fundamentally disagree. Being leader of the opposition is exactly why I think Corbyn is less qualified to run a caretaker government - he doesn't want it to be a caretaker one only.
Constitutionally, all that matters is that the PM of GoNU commands the support of the house. If Corbyn can do that, fine, but evidence is he can't - in which case he has no constitutional mandate at all.