You are reading a single comment by @campervangogh and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
No, they are completely different. Like comparing a "sticky bidon" to systematic doping. Both are forms of cheating but hardly comparable.
They cheated and got caught.
Should they be shot?
Should Faf?
Should Athers have been?
Should Martin Crowe?
Shahid?
Wasim Akram, and Waqar Younis?Fuck dude, get over it.
campervangogh
Nonsense. Comparing the well used tactic of ball tampering to the well used strategy of match fixing is perfectly sensible. It's cheating. Equating them may be of less use. Of more use might be adding the comparison of bowling a few materially inconsequential no-balls. There's a sliding scale of cheating cuntishness - the fact that Smith et al weren't betting on themselves seems to encourage some people to give them a free pass.