-
It’s also made me reflect on the Westminster peado investigation.
Epstein pled guilty and is a convicted sex offender.
My understanding is that the Westminster peado ring was based on the allegations of one person.
hugo7-
And didn't it turn out to be totally fabricated?
-
Epstein got off ridiculously lightly given the amount of evidence against him. The large no of Victims werent able to testify against him instead branded prostitutes.
Wesrminster paedo ring press coverage has been largely focused on that one now discredited accuser.
However theres loads of sketchy stuff around Westminster.
Including and not limited to:
Dossier that went missing
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westminster_paedophile_dossierPaedophile Information Exchange and links / parlaimentary funding
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paedophile_Information_ExchangeVarious individual mps with sketchy past
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-merseyside-47528653Potential special branch / intelligence service cover ups
http://nyenquirer.uk/mi5-special-branch-prominent-paedophiles-cover-peter-jaconelli/More info here
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=KkNvQ66GE-0
Stonehedge
sacredhart
I find this Epstein case fascinating. It’s a horrifying glimpse behind the curtain of some of those at the top of society.
It encapsulates paedophilia , the royal family, US president, US intelligence agencies, Robert Maxwell and family, Acosta...
It’s also made me reflect on the Westminster peado investigation. The met were suppressing stories on MPS abusing kids in the 70s/80s (at the same time they were lobbying for abolishing the age of consent via the Peadophile information exchange) The Epstein case has made me wonder how much this was being used as leverage on these individuals too.