-
• #102
Difficult to be inclusive by pandering* to those with closed minds. The parents should be more concerned about fracking and torturous regimes than boobs.
(too strong a word, I'm not trying to be derogatory)
-
• #103
The jersey's, or the ones' I can see on line, advertise "Pascal's Submissive Sluts".
-
• #104
Thank you James.......
-
• #105
bike porn
There is a legit argument for not normalising pornography ... but the bar for censorship should be high. High-enough to balance the consequences.
-
• #106
Hmmm, perhaps there's a good reason why I'm not my club's welfare officer...
-
• #107
If BC kick LFGSS CC out, perhaps we could seek asylum with USA Cycling. I gather it is all the rage these days.
-
• #108
I don't think it's excessive censorship to say that permitting that kind of thing at a sanctioned event is pretty wrong on multiple levels.
Why should female entrants to a cycling competition have to be subjected to that? Wouldn't be permitted in football, rugby, tennis or even motorsport and goes against years of concerted effort to make the sport more inclusive. I think labelling people who object as having"closed minds" is a cheap way of dismissing quite valid objections...
-
• #109
Tommy is begging for political asylum from the states so I guess lufguss could too...
-
• #110
It's a good job that M_Vs comments are printed on the LFGSS jersey then, isn't it?
-
• #111
Here's another whole layer of irony when it comes to 'dodginess' in connection with drugs:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-18880269
I hope we all know that HSBC is the major sponsor of BC
It's even possible that this goes some way to explaining why they have brought up the whole business
-
• #112
they have brought up the whole business
British Cycling have asked for some posts on an internet forum to be deleted because one of their sponsors has been rapped for money laundering?
-
• #113
British Cycling have asked for some posts on a London based internet forum to be deleted because one of their sponsors has been rapped for money laundering in Mexico?
Don't you see the connection here?
-
• #114
Link please?
(asking for a friend)
-
• #115
Google is also your friend.
-
• #116
Fuck em, dirty bastards!
-
• #117
I'm hoping to enter the bec / catford hill climbs this year and have realised I may need a CTT club membership to do so - from reading this, the lfgss club sounds like it's still CTT registered (which is great) but I can't get the club membership to work on Shopify. Am I missing something?
Edit: yes. Seen messages that the Shopify account is closed. Is the club still open though? Keen to join!
-
• #118
The club is still open, CTT affiliation still in place and will be renewed.
If someone comes enquiring as to whether someone is a member, so long as I can correlate your email to an account on here then the answer will be yes.
-
• #120
Since it got a bump by someone else, was there ever a resolution to this?
BC never brought any heat my way.
-
• #121
Seems the club has now expired on BC?
https://www.britishcycling.org.uk/club/profile/6822/lfgss-cc -
• #122
Well that's surprising... given that I paid for the affiliation and it's showing as active in the Club dashboard.
-
• #123
Ah... there we go. It was just something in a text field, I've edited it :D
-
• #124
ah excellent! I was just a bit confused, couldn't find the club on the search https://www.britishcycling.org.uk/clubfinder but thinking about it, maybe that is intentional(?).
-
• #125
Hiding it from search is intentional :)
Quite possibly yes. We once had a complaint about a club members use of the word porn in a bike porn type context. Not everyone is like us and a big part of running an inclusive club is recognising that.