Without prejudice, of the applicable law, no brand of tobacco, spirits, pornographic bis products or any other products that might damage the image of the UCI or of cycling in general shall be associated directly or indirectly with a licence-holder, a UCI team or a national or international cycling competition.
I’m not sure why tobacco, spirits and porn should be singled out as damaging the image of the uci when fossil fuels (and other dubious funding bodies) aren’t.
I’m not sure why tobacco, spirits and porn should be singled out as damaging the image of the uci when fossil fuels (and other dubious funding bodies) aren’t.