You are reading a single comment by @dubtap and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
He purchased a racing license that said "don't do a thing" and "did that thing". He could have not raced afterwards to recover from a limb threatening injury but chose to. He let a doc use a drug on him that even I vaguely know is not allowed but "phone signal".
TLDR strict liability is strict liability
Martin Maes getting banned for 90 days is a shambles when it was prescribed by the doctors at a race and the original antibiotics didnt work. Just crap from the UCI
UCI is one rule for one and another for another.
https://www.pinkbike.com/news/martin-maes-tests-positive-for-masking-agent-at-ews-rotorua-and-tasmania-receives-90-day-ban.html