-
• #877
From the sounds of it, will ride very similar to my CDF. Considering replacing my 853 Donohue with something that’ll clear tyres bigger than 23, finding a frame builder to modify the Donohue being another option (just needs a wee dent in the seat tube). Doesn’t sound like 725 equilibrium is the one. Thanks for the feedback.
-
• #878
for what it's worth, an equilibrium behaves waaay more like a road bike than a cdf, but compared with what you want to replace, it won't be as snappy.
-
• #879
https://geometrygeeks.bike/compare/genesis-croix-de-fer-2017-l,genesis-equilibrium-disc-2017-l/
equilibrium and croix de fer have quite different geo
i've owned both, although i didn't keep the croix for long as it was too small. -
• #880
You could try to find an 853 equilibrium?
-
• #881
It was seeing Jambons eq 853 for sale that started this train of thought, if they’re fetching around £400 tho and then I have to source a carbon fork, it starts shaping up into an expensive experiment.
-
• #882
Get a Volare? Much closer to your Donohue.
-
• #883
Clearance for 32 though?
-
• #884
Just bought ex-display 931 Equilibrium disc for fast audaxey style ride... Then realised fork is post mount, rear is flat mount. Who does this?!
Much excite tho.
-
• #886
Nooo, don't sell your Donohue! I vouch for some crimping.
23mm is pretty tight though, where is it tight? Do you think you'd be able to eke out up to a 32mm? I can fit 25mm tyres on mine, & that feels comfortable enough if you get some nice ones with supple tyre walls.
-
• #887
Contacted woodrup (admittedly via Instagram) but had no reply.
In 2 minds of having a go myself or persisting with woodrup or BJ.
-
• #888
Crimping an 853 frame that fits 23 to get to 32? Surely not?
-
• #889
Woodrup are quite responsive on Facebook I've found.
Wouldn't risk it myself, at least see if it's feasible with a proper frame builder first.
-
• #890
It’s definitely doable, just need the correct kit.
-
• #891
drilling 853 for di2 ok if crimping is doable? Winston wont do it :(
-
• #892
Winston has a good quote about instafamous framebuilders, he says you never hear/see any failure stories. I also think Winston plays it too safe BUT he has a point.
-
• #893
Use a reinforcement?
-
• #894
never question winston
-
• #895
Yeah I get that but it's the mixing of both standards on the same frame that is a bit confused... Also, I don't think flat mount calipers can be adapted to post (or is it IS...) which means sourcing two different calipers (well, definitely if you don't want an adapter...)
-
• #896
the one off Ebay?
-
• #897
yep
-
• #898
Nice, Post a pic when it's built!
-
• #899
fuck me.
to add to previous disc brake moan, apparently I now need a fucking adapter for my flat mount caliper to accept the standard 160 rotor that the front post mount caliper doesn't need. Thus taking the supposedly simpler, more elegant system that doesn't need the hassle of an adapter, and forcing you to use one anyway unless you want to buy a smaller, less effective rotor.
Seriously tempted to just get long drop rim brake calipers...
-
• #900
but that's definitly normal, equilibriums take post mount front, and flat mount rear.
an imbalanced 160=140 equilibrium.
that said, the rear adapter the switches from 140 to 160 is just a wedge, and unlikely to cause alignement issues.
fair enough.
mine is the same model as @Technics100 bright yellow one so must be a 2015.
according to Strava I rode it for around 8k miles.
i used mine pretty exclusively as my main road bike for several years as a commuter (road/canal path mix), on club rides, on a 3 day bike packing tour around Galloway forest park last year.
it's a fast bike when it needs to be, but also comfortable with wider tyres fitted, and was capable on gravel/dirt trails through the woods occasionally. the ride is noticeably less harsh than my alu framed road bikes, maybe not quite as direct.
it's never going to be a super light bike, but mine was under 10kg and could have lost a fair chunk of weight off the wheelset to make it feel more sprightly.
my main reason for swapping out the frame was for increased tyre clearance.