You are reading a single comment by @Mickie_Cricket and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
I'm kind of assuming they're not diverting hundreds to the underground, but if you're relying on really quite small numbers to hold bridges and junctions, not exhausting your resources seems pretty crucial.
-
I would guess their argument/belief is that it's far too late for "sympathy" to make meaningful changes.
There will be plenty of people using the tube who will have ignored all previous mentions of climate change and the issue society face because of it, and direct action is the only way to make them notice.
(N.b. I don't agree with this POV, just know someone fairly involved in it and would imagine that's the response I'd get)
hoefla
branwen
@Mickie_Cricket
I think disrupting the tube is going to lose them a lot of sympathy. They should have just focused their resources on the existing locations.