If you; 1) didn't treat the "other" group in society in an objectively bad way - i.e. harming them, etc. and 2) as a result of the policy no harm came to the other group; is there anything intrinsically wrong with prioritising the citizens of a nation, and using the nation as a construct to unify and create solidarity in society?
Also out of curiosity (as an ideal) do you think employing communism would be positive because it creates economic equality / is inherently equitable, or because it would result in a happier more cohesive society? (if both, is one more important?)
Playing devil's advocate here...
If you; 1) didn't treat the "other" group in society in an objectively bad way - i.e. harming them, etc. and 2) as a result of the policy no harm came to the other group; is there anything intrinsically wrong with prioritising the citizens of a nation, and using the nation as a construct to unify and create solidarity in society?
Also out of curiosity (as an ideal) do you think employing communism would be positive because it creates economic equality / is inherently equitable, or because it would result in a happier more cohesive society? (if both, is one more important?)