-
If only you spent more time using and looking at the bracelet it would be reason alone to get a new one, amazing engineering. The problem with me and Rolex is I genuinely use the date function but I don’t get on with the cyclops which really limits my choice. A saw a Sub for sale today with the glass replaced, looked great!
@freddo up your street...? https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/enicarbook/time-for-a-change-a-book-about-the-lost-watch-bran/description
1 Attachment
-
inchpincher
-
That's why people buy the deep sea but it's huge. If you've lived with the Cyclops and don't like it then I can see why you would avoid it. Can't see why it would bother anyone irl. It's like the bezel engraving, I just never notice it when I'm wearing the watch.
I was under the impression you can get the cyclops removed anyway.
-
That’s the perfect Rolex
-
Raises a v interesting point. (Cyclops)
Why? Perfectly legible date without.
-
That is really nice. Personally I don’t like the bubble and that looks great without it.
Airhead
BRM
Ordinata
TGR
I chose between those when I bought mine. The new one was just available and the old one was still in some shops. I went for the new one, it's a beautiful watch to wear and own but I added the smaller case dateless sub to scratch the itch and the older case is a thing of beauty. I like the fat face though, the ceramic bezel doesn't do much for me though. Bracelet is a much more solid item on the newer cases.