if consensus isn't reached, it opens the door to revocation or a people's vote as all democratic options within parliament will have been exhausted.
Revocation would require not just the consensus that had just been (yet again) shown to not exist, it would require some strong leadership to drive a decision that most MPs who secretly think it's a good idea are scared of.
A people's vote has more chance because
MPs can say "I'm only voting for this because all those other bastards wouldn't agree with my sensible proposals". 650 people standing in a circle, wishing they had 649 arms to point and blame all the others.
A lot of the blame for what happens next can be offloaded to "the people".
I couldn't say. I was at somebody's leaving drinks last night and didn't reconnect with this thread till the morning. As a result, I no longer know what's been happening and it'll take hours of synching between here, Twitter and the various editorials before I'm back on track.
I assume when she brings it back for MV3 that's when the Kyle amendment will be raised. Requires full Labour whipping and a good chunk of pro remain Torry support to pass though, would be super tight.
Revocation would require not just the consensus that had just been (yet again) shown to not exist, it would require some strong leadership to drive a decision that most MPs who secretly think it's a good idea are scared of.
A people's vote has more chance because