You are reading a single comment by @JWestland and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Letting soldiers fire at civilians/rioters with live rounds, what did the commanding officers think was going to happen?

    No prosecutions for them it seems. Was this government policy at that time?

    Government policy was pretty much the same as expressed by Karen Bradley last week. Killings " that were at the hands of the military and police were not crimes, they were people acting under orders and fulfilling their duties in a dignified and appropriate way."

    The actual policy at the time is unclear although the Army commander for NI "General Ford wrote a chilling memorandum to his superior, General Sir Harry Tuzo. It said: "I am coming to the conclusion that the minimum force necessary to achieve a restoration of law and order is to shoot selected ringleaders amongst the DYH (Derry Young Hooligans) after clear warnings have been issued."
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-northern-ireland-47559123

  • So the policy is not clear, I guess that means there's nothing to go on to sue the government for allowing COs to give the order to use live rounds?

    Bradley is looking like even more of an idiot now after the court ruled one soldier is going to be charged.

About

Avatar for JWestland @JWestland started