You are reading a single comment by @salmonchild and its replies.
Click here to read the full conversation.
-
That piece is terrible:
'haven't watched it, but here are some uncorroborated statements and a dig at one of the accusers'
salmonchild-
haven't watched it
That stood out to me as well.
Although there are some statements of fact there (or what I assume are statements of fact, having not verified them myself).
That said, having watched it, the individuals and their families are so utterly convincing maybe it's best to make the case against them without having watched it.
hugo7
I guess passing is in a car, but yeah that is odd. Didn't realise it was so heavily moderated. Do you think it could be you?
Counterview to the MJ doc:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/joevogel/2019/01/29/what-you-should-know-about-the-new-michael-jackson-documentary/#
I guess it brings up a lot of the same arguments around Savile, although MJ did actually have allegations and trials at the time.
Also thought this was interesting: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/mar/04/banking-leak-exposes-russian-network-link-to-prince-charles-troika-laundromat