Quite. Literally seems to be unique in this respect; if definition #2 completely undermines definition #1 what's the point in having that definition? I'll accept that context usually tells you which meaning is meant (like if it's coming from the mouth of a football pundit), but it still feels wrong.
Quite. Literally seems to be unique in this respect; if definition #2 completely undermines definition #1 what's the point in having that definition? I'll accept that context usually tells you which meaning is meant (like if it's coming from the mouth of a football pundit), but it still feels wrong.