-
With one available, why wouldn't you use one?
Because the OHP is a full body exercise, not an isolation exercise. The core should be doing a large portion of the work. If you're struggling with technique, the last thing you want to do cut corners by using a belt.
If you want to build just your shoulder strength / size, then a seated press is more efficient.
People seem to use belts as fashion accessories, they would be much stronger all around if core strength and flexibility was improved, then belts would be unnecessary.
dbadger-
That’s a very debatable point. There are various studies in relation to wearing belts, I don’t think there is any definitive answer.
Belt usage can increase ab strength. Any programs I have looked at seem to say use a belt on your working weight but not the warmups.
If it helps with back safety, it can’t be a bad thing and any professional lifters I see on tv wear them - as good a pointer as anything. -
Well I can press 25% more with a belt, compared to the point where the weight makes me mentally think twice. So the extra stress is likely to be making me stronger overall. Including my core and legs which is going to be more effective than a seated press.
TGR
user69121
Conversely, OHP is not an exercise you want to compromise your potential core strength by not using a belt.
I don't use it for lighter warmup sets, but will put it on for working sets.
With one available, why wouldn't you use one?
@spenceey
How to OHP with Mark Rippetoe >>
https://youtu.be/CnBmiBqp-AI