-
I'm in a very similar property (Victorian house, I'm in the upstairs flat) and own a share of freehold with the downstairs. We don't do it through a limited company (not really sure what the benefit is for two people and the faff of having to file accounts), we're both named on the freehold title and then each flat has a lease.
I get on well with the guy downstairs so it works fine. The only cost is the building insurance, maintenance costs are dealt with as and when they arise. It's an easy arrangement and you have the security of being able to veto any stuff you don't like.
One big benefit for me was that I could do a loft conversion with a minimum of effort (just had an email from the guy downstairs saying he was OK with it) and extending the lease is just solicitor's fees.
I'd agree that share of freehold would probably add more than £3k to the property value, it's just a bit more security than only having a lease.
Owning the whole freehold gives you more options but a share is definitely beneficial.
-
I'm not sure it really would
It really would. I wouldn't buy a flat that wasn't at least share of.
For £3k it's a total no brainer. I disagree that there's no benefit to owning a share, with a share you have equal power, if the owns it he has absolute power.
Get back round the table and explain that the access thing is not about him because he's so nice and reasonable* but in case he sells and you get a nightmare neighbour.
*doesn't need to be true
My sister owns a top floor flat above the freeholder, who live on the ground floor. It's been pretty annoying for her generally - them turning down requests to extend, charging them for maintenance, etc, generally just someone having control over you who ideally you'd be in an equal partnership with.
I'd definitely try to co-buy the freehold if you can.
Edit - I'd assume your home's value would go up by at least 3k if you had a share of the freehold too.