You are reading a single comment by @Fox and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Would you admit to having been out-foxed (sorry) for 30+ hours by a £19.99 flying toy?
    Or would you big it up?
    I'm not saying it wasn't a commercial spec drone - more that the line from the police is one to be expected.
    Strange that although we have many sightings, we still have no ID on the drone - not even type.
    I know they've said it's comm. spec. - Am I wrong to expect illustrations thereof?

  • I'm old fashioned in that I presume the police are telling the truth unless there's good reason to presume otherwise, especially in relation to a high profile national incident. I don't think there's any shame in the fact they haven't identified the perpetrators yet. It's obviously very difficult once you understand the issues involved.

    Nobody has managed to get a clear photo so far, AFAIK. Many of the intrusions were at night and the drones had lights attached: presumably to make them more obvious but then all you can really see is the light.

  • Can't really argue with any of that.
    FWIW my (favourite) niece is a police officer, as is her husband, both stationed at Brixton.
    I get to hear some eye-opening things.... which neither should (probably) share with me.

About

Avatar for Fox @Fox started