You are reading a single comment by @Oliver Schick and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.
  • Don't blame me, I was just telling people what's in the Wikipedia entry, and they have a schwa between k and n in the pronunciation guide. Either it's special (e.g. there is no schwa in ˈknakˌvʊʁst) or the Knipex article is wrong.

  • Well, you said:

    As pronounced, there is a weak unstressed vowel because k is a velar plosive.

    There's none in 'Hackney' or 'Cockney', my earlier examples, either, unless a speaker deliberately lengthens it (which is obviously perfectly permissible if someone so wishes). It's simply a sequence of two consonants.

    and they have a schwa between k and n in the pronunciation guide

    Yes, that's wrong.

  • It's simply a sequence of two consonants.

    There's a syllable break between the k and n in 'ackney, but not in Knipex. If you come to juddering halt at the k in Knipex in the way you do in 'ackney, it sounds weird (at least to those of us who don't speak Xhosa 🙂), the epenthetic schwa allows it to trip off the tongue.

About