The good thing about unilateral revocation is that it also, obviosuly, implies unilateral extension (by 2 years alor more at least).
I think that, given this ruling, it would be arguable that an arbitrary extension should be ours for the deciding. Should take some heat out of the situation.
The good thing about unilateral revocation is that it also, obviosuly, implies unilateral extension (by 2 years alor more at least).
I think that, given this ruling, it would be arguable that an arbitrary extension should be ours for the deciding. Should take some heat out of the situation.