I'd use the original post as an example, the blame was all laid at Amazon's door. I don't remember a similar post when Toyota, Walmart or Foxconn (who aren't famed for their good treatment of staff) had subsidies.
I think we'll have to agree to disagree. My view is that the countries, states, etc are most culpable and the best way of avoiding these subsidies is to not offer them, not to expect them not to be taken.
There has been plenty of Rucus about Foxconn, but I would also argue that Amazon deserve to be singled out because they explicitly out compete local shops etc creating a much poorer retail environment for everyone, in a way that a company like Toyota do not
I'd use the original post as an example, the blame was all laid at Amazon's door. I don't remember a similar post when Toyota, Walmart or Foxconn (who aren't famed for their good treatment of staff) had subsidies.
I think we'll have to agree to disagree. My view is that the countries, states, etc are most culpable and the best way of avoiding these subsidies is to not offer them, not to expect them not to be taken.