The Mamnick Thread

I imagine Thom's most recent sock-puppet will be along to condemn these guys, maybe inviting Pegida to march in protest: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/sep/11/seven-members-paedophile-gang-jailed?CMP=share_btn_tw

Thom #6. Particularly disturbing outing Rich; a customer who has shown blind loyalty to him and his brand.

Thom #7

Really?
Are these all different aliases?

Can someone do some text analysis?

Agree, don’t know how or why he’d have so many false accounts, especially when one appears to undermine one of his defenders.

Hasn't that been his whole online persona/self-publicising model? They all have the same 'I'm not racist, but....' Start, followed by a link or quote from an historical downtrodden figure, a bit of defensive work, bobbing and weaving, culminating in an open invitation to chat on the phone.

He's probably a very good face to face salesman, and has won potential customers/suppliers over with his telephone patter......hence the invitation, as he is confident in his ability to counter arguments.....I know the type.

He/they are also all displaying the same narcissistic tendencies.....unfortunately, I've met them before too.

It might, of course, be the fact that they are all mates, down the pub.

Neither do I but that’s his MO. Ask yourself who would join the forum and thread randomly and make such a post out of the blue? New user. One post. I know of a number of fake twitter accounts he’s using or has used to troll people. One of which was Dr Chris Cushing and then there’s aesthete_thom.

Don’t forget the Grace Jones fan from yesterday.

http://www.cyclingnews.com/features/anthony-clarks-squid-squidcross-gallery/

Is Chris Cushing a false account? How much time does he have to create online cunty characters. I have found it a full time operation to create the dancing james cunty identity.

However I sadly believe you, other people I know who are local to Thom have also confirmed his habitual use of fake accounts. It appears he uses them in a Putin-esque fashion to spread confusion. So the post about vapid-twit’s business practices is there to try to undermine credibility of other anti Thom posts. This shit is crazy.

They're either him or directed by him. This thread hasn't been randomly stumbled upon by curious Mamnick-loving bigots. Would put cash money he did the Grace Jones one himself - the ridiculous premise justifying the blacking up is summat he'd find hilarious, and the female and 'mild' dyslexia as deflection tactics. It was a bit too far-fetched to hold water.

All we need now is someone to fake their own death...

Too soon man, too soon.

All these twitter accounts are Thom. And these are just the ones I know of. aesthete_thom was his too remember but it’s now suspended - he never denied retweeting the Diane Abbott meme, he doubled down on it in fact. The Christian Bartholomew account was trolling one of his old adversaries this morning. But, in true Thom style, tweets have been deleted.

1 Attachment

Where does he find time for this? It's nuts.

With that much creativity, he could be starting up his own brand, based on originality and innovation.

You know, as opposed to one that is derivative and plagiarising.

Depends which one of his personalities is in charge at any given moment and he has as many of them as he does bobble hats. And there’s the IG accounts too.....

Aren't the 'Bloody hell' and 'ken Dodd' accounts his too?

Ken Dodd16 is Christian Bartholomew is Thom Barnett. Ultimately. Think Bloodyhell account is legit.

Does each personality require a different bobble hat?
Perhaps this is what's driving the production of bobble hats.

Also. If he is making this many personalities up, perhaps it's indicative of something fundamentally wrong. And perhaps we should leave this?
Unless it's to discuss favourite Grace Jones songs.
I am not advocating ignoring racism @amey

Nobody is claiming Rich Stoodley is Thom.

But I am wondering who you are.

Lurking for a day?

That's the kind of mistake you make when you have so many sock puppets all demanding your attention at the same time.

.

is that an anon mask?

how apt.

Time for Big Boss to swing the anti-alias sock puppet ban hammer, I think.