Analog film photography and cameras

You are reading a single comment by @Nef and its replies. Click here to read the full conversation.

•

Ste_S in reply to @jambon

I find it's awkward to shoot casually. Like it's obviously heavy, needs a seperate meter, tripod really and focusing is harder than the RZ67 I had before. For landscapes with cable release/tripod nothing comes close for me but wouldn't mind something I like using everyday. Third world problems I know!

If you like using it for Landscapes, I probably wouldn't get rid of it.
There's plenty of 35mm cameras out there you can get for not much money enabling you to keep your Hassleblad.

Some of it also sounds as though you just need to get out and shoot more....

•

Nef in reply to @Ste_S

I’d second the motion about just using it more. I found my RB67 a total pain (and I still do) but I just got better at using it and there are plenty shots I’m glad that I have on MF rather than 35mm as a result.

That said, I’m always tempted to sell it and to get something smaller - I had my hands on a mate’s hassy the other day and it was dreamy!

About

Avatar for Nef @Nef started